Claims

Adults read ordinary prose much faster than arithmetic problem material or isolated numerals

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r? · q2
Currency · newest study 1922 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Ordinary prose is read much faster than either problem material or isolated numerals by adult readers. → New Publications in Educational Psychology and Related Fields of Education 1922

Evidence

New Publications in Educational Psychology and Related Fields of Education. (1922). https://eric.ed.gov/

q2 · i? · causal · r?

Conclusion drawn in the review of Terry's University of Chicago reading monograph, based on photographic recording of eye movements as six adult subjects read problems, numerals, and prose. The review states that "Ordinary prose is read much faster than either the problem material or isolated numerals."

"Ordinary prose is read much faster than either the problem material or isolated numerals."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id prose-read-faster-than-numerals-and-problems
title Adults read ordinary prose much faster than arithmetic problem material or isolated numerals
description Adults read ordinary prose much faster than arithmetic problem material or isolated numerals
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 1922
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-25
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — new-publications-in-educational-psychology-and-related-fields-of-education-1922

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.