Claims

All available evidence on the PSU–achievement relationship is cross-sectional, preventing causal conclusions

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r3 · q4
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q4 i? All included studies were cross-sectional, so the direction of the temporal relationship between PSU and academic achievement cannot be established from the available evidence. → Paterna 2024

Evidence

Paterna 2024

Paterna, Adrian; Alcaraz-Ibáñez, Manuel; Aguilar-Parra, Jose M.; Salavera, Carlos; Demetrovics, Zsolt; Griffiths, Mark D. (2024). Problematic smartphone use and academic achievement: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Behavioral Addictions. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.2024.00014

q4 · i? · quant-synthesis · r3

Limitation stated in the article's Discussion: the meta-analysis included only cross-sectional primary studies, so no causal inference about PSU as an antecedent of achievement is possible. The authors call for longitudinal designs to corroborate the theoretical plausibility of PSU as an antecedent.

"First, all available data were cross-sectional, which prevents drawing conclusions regarding causality based solely on findings from the present study."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.