Claims

Problematic smartphone use shows a small negative pooled correlation with academic achievement (r = −0.110)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r3 · q4 · i1 small
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q4 i1 Across 33 effect sizes from 29 studies (N = 48,490), PSU and academic achievement show a small negative pooled correlation under a random-effects model. → Paterna 2024

Evidence

Paterna 2024

Paterna, Adrian; Alcaraz-Ibáñez, Manuel; Aguilar-Parra, Jose M.; Salavera, Carlos; Demetrovics, Zsolt; Griffiths, Mark D. (2024). Problematic smartphone use and academic achievement: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Behavioral Addictions. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.2024.00014

q4 · i1 · quant-synthesis · r3

Meta-analysis of 33 effect sizes from 29 cross-sectional studies (N = 48,490) retrieved up to February 2023, pooled with a random-effects model. The printed effect size is r = −0.110 (p < 0.001), described as "a negative small-sized effect" with high heterogeneity (I2 = 93.70).

"Findings from the random-effects model (see Fig. 2) showed a negative small-sized effect (r = −0.110, p < 0.001; 95% CI = −0.156 to −0.066, I2 = 93.70)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.