Academic procrastination and learned helplessness positively predict cheating tendency, while academic self-efficacy negatively predicts it among university students¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Academic procrastination and learned helplessness positively predicted cheating tendency, whereas academic self-efficacy negatively predicted it. → Yilmaz A 2026
Evidence¶
Yilmaz A 2026¶
Yilmaz A (2026) The psychological mechanisms and behavioral determinants of academic integrity in the age of artificial intelligence. Front. Psychol. 17:1853790. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1853790
q2 · i? · associational · r2
Cross-sectional correlational survey of 1,045 undergraduates from multiple disciplines, analyzed with multiple regression. The study reports that "academic procrastination and learned helplessness positively predicted cheating tendency, whereas academic self-efficacy negatively predicted it." No effect sizes are printed in the available text.
"The findings showed that academic procrastination and learned helplessness positively predicted cheating tendency, whereas academic self-efficacy negatively predicted it."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Learners' task-specific self-efficacy beliefs predict whether they initiate, persist through, and recover from difficulty on academic tasks. — the general claim this finding bears on, with the studies behind it
- Cheating tendency mediates the effects of procrastination, learned helplessness, and self-efficacy on AI-assisted dishonesty, with indirect effects stronger at higher AI use — a broader claim this one bears on
- Cheating tendency significantly predicts AI-assisted academic dishonesty, and the association is stronger at higher levels of AI use — related
- Self-efficacy negatively correlates with cheating, but actual ability does not inversely correlate with dishonesty — related
- Beliefs about action and willpower, shaped by discussion, causally alter behaviour such as cheating and persistence — related
- Academic self-efficacy is negatively associated with AI dependency among university students — related
- Self-handicapping decreases effort to protect self-worth, in contrast to defensive pessimism — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
psychological-antecedents-predict-cheating-tendency |
title |
Academic procrastination and learned helplessness positively predict cheating tendency, while academic self-efficacy negatively predicts it among university students |
description |
Academic procrastination and learned helplessness positively predict cheating tendency, while academic self-efficacy negatively predicts it among university students |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-11 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — yilmaz-a-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.