Psychological safety is positively associated with negotiation activities (verification, clarification, agreement) in ICT-supported collaborative problem-solving¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2007 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Psychological safety had significant positive main effects on verification, clarification, and agreement, and increased negotiation per contribution. → Pieter J. Beers 2007 q2 i? Psychological safety did not differ between coercion conditions and was treated as a covariate rather than an outcome of NTool. → Pieter J. Beers 2007

Evidence¶

Pieter J. Beers 2007¶

Pieter J. Beers, Paul A. Kirschner, Henny P. A. Boshuizen, Wim H. Gijselaers. (2007). ICT-support for grounding in the classroom. Instructional Science 35, 535–556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-007-9018-5

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Repeated measures ANCOVA on coded messages from vocational education teams, with group-mean psychological safety (Cochran's a = .69) as covariate. Alongside main effects on verification, F(1, 11) = 5.83, P < .05, and clarification, F(1, 11) = 6.67, P < .05, the article reports "a significant positive main effect of psychological safety on agreement."

"Furthermore, there was a significant positive main effect of psychological safety on agreement, F(1, 11) = 7.35, P < .05."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• High-coercion (Stringent) NTool increases explicit negotiation activities in secondary vocational collaborative problem-solving, though the verification effect was stronger in morning sessions
• The low- and high-coercion versions of NTool did not differ on perceived sociability or social presence — related
• Contrary to expectation, common ground after collaboration was highest in the low-coercion (Idiosyncratic) NTool groups, not the Stringent groups — related