High-coercion (Stringent) NTool increases explicit negotiation activities in secondary vocational collaborative problem-solving, though the verification effect was stronger in morning sessions¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2007 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Coercion and psychological safety had significant main effects on negotiation of meaning per contribution, which was highest in the Stringent groups. → Pieter J. Beers 2007
Evidence¶
Pieter J. Beers 2007¶
Pieter J. Beers, Paul A. Kirschner, Henny P. A. Boshuizen, Wim H. Gijselaers. (2007). ICT-support for grounding in the classroom. Instructional Science 35, 535–556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-007-9018-5
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Analysis of verifications plus clarifications divided by the number of contributions per group, using repeated measures ANCOVA with psychological safety as covariate. The article reports "significant main effects of both psychological safety and coercion" and that "Negotiation per contribution was highest in the Stringent groups."
"We found significant main effects of both psychological safety and coercion on negotiation of meaning per contribution, F(1, 11) = 9.34, P < .05 and F(1, 11) = 8.17, P < .05 respectively. Negotiation per contribution was highest in the Stringent groups"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Cognitive load did not clearly increase during group work under high coercion; a three-way interaction of session time, cognitive load and coercion emerged, with a marginal main effect of coercion
- Psychological safety is positively associated with negotiation activities (verification, clarification, agreement) in ICT-supported collaborative problem-solving
- Contrary to expectation, common ground after collaboration was highest in the low-coercion (Idiosyncratic) NTool groups, not the Stringent groups — related
- The low- and high-coercion versions of NTool did not differ on perceived sociability or social presence — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
stringent-ntool-increases-negotiation |
title |
High-coercion (Stringent) NTool increases explicit negotiation activities in secondary vocational collaborative problem-solving, though the verification effect was stronger in morning sessions |
description |
High-coercion (Stringent) NTool increases explicit negotiation activities in secondary vocational collaborative problem-solving, though the verification effect was stronger in morning sessions |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2007 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — pieter-j-beers-2007 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.