Claims

Typical early childhood providers implemented PTR-YC with very high fidelity, while BAU classrooms completed almost none of the process steps

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? PTR-YC classrooms completed 100% of the 13 fidelity checklist steps, whereas BAU classrooms completed on average less than one step. → Glen Dunlap 2018

Evidence

Glen Dunlap 2018

Glen Dunlap, Phillip Strain, Janice K. Lee, Jaclyn Joseph, and Nancy Leech. (2018). A Randomized Controlled Evaluation of Prevent-Teach-Reinforce for Young Children. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121417724874

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Fidelity was assessed with a 13-item checklist covering the five PTR-YC steps, completed by research staff as the process unfolded. "participants in the PTR-YC condition completed 100% of the 13 steps"; no effect size is printed for this contrast.

"The data revealed that participants in the PTR-YC condition completed 100% of the 13 steps, and participants in the BAU condition completed, on average, less than one of the 13 steps."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.