Public school students improved by only about 8 points over the same year¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2023: baselines and conditions change
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Public school students' paired pre-post scores differed significantly but modestly (M = 17.28 vs M = 26.11; t199 = 22.051, sig. .000). → Iqbal 2018
Evidence¶
Iqbal 2018¶
Iqbal, M., & Rafi, M. S. (2018). A Comparative Study of English Language Teaching Practices at the Access Program and Public Schools. Bulletin of Education and Research, 40(3), 231-249. https://pu.edu.pk/journals/index.php/ber/
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Paired samples t test (Table 5) on 200 public school students tested at Access entry and after one year: M = 17.28 vs M = 26.11, t199 = 22.051. The article states that without suitable milieus and methods "the notable difference cannot be created"; no effect size is printed.
"The result also shows that the result of post -test was only 8points higher than the scores of pre-test (95% CI [8.04, 9.62])."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- After one year, Access Program students significantly outperform public school students who had also qualified for the program on a diagnostic English test — related
- Access Program students improved by about 24 points on the diagnostic test over one year — related
- The complete sample showed a significant overall pre-to-post gain of about 16 points — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.