Qualitative studies identify dynamics, patterns, and development in team learning behaviours, linked to situated knowledge and transactivity¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · reviewr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · checked against its sources 2026-10-21 (automated, 2 of 2 entries) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Qualitative studies found chaotic increases and decreases (dynamics), repetitive patterns, and development in sharing, co-construction, constructive conflict, reflection and team activity. → Andreas Widmann 2025
q2 i? Pattern occurrence depends on conditions: locally situated knowledge and higher transactivity are associated with more engagement and longer recurring periods of learning behaviours. → Andreas Widmann 2025 (2)
Evidence¶
Andreas Widmann 2025¶
Andreas Widmann, Regina H. Mulder. (2025). Change in team learning behaviours in work teams – A systematic review. Educational Research Review 49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2025.100736
q2 · i? · review · r2
Synthesis of seven qualitative longitudinal studies using interviews, observations and documents. The review reports chaotic increases and decreases in one study, patterns in two studies, and development in sharing, co-construction and constructive conflict in two studies, with results inconsistent across teams and contexts.
"The results of Van Dun and Wilderom (2021) indicate chaotic increases and decreases of sharing, co-construction, reflection and team activity."
Andreas Widmann 2025 (2)¶
Andreas Widmann, Regina H. Mulder. (2025). Change in team learning behaviours in work teams – A systematic review. Educational Research Review 49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2025.100736
q2 · i? · review · r2
The review reports two qualitative studies linking change to conditions: engagement related to whether team knowledge is locally or remotely situated, and Zoethout et al. (2017) found the more transactivity, the longer the recurring periods of sharing, co-construction and constructive conflict.
"The results of Sole & Edmondon (2002) indicate that the increase and decrease of the team's engagement in team learning behaviours are related to the situated knowledge of the team members."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Quantitative longitudinal studies mostly show minor change in team learning behaviours, with dynamics in boundary crossing and team activity — reports the opposite
- Constructive conflict positively predicts the development of a shared mental model of the task in teams — related
- Co-construction alone does not contribute to shared mental model development and shows a negative unique effect — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
qualitative-studies-dynamics-patterns-development |
title |
Qualitative studies identify dynamics, patterns, and development in team learning behaviours, linked to situated knowledge and transactivity |
description |
Qualitative studies identify dynamics, patterns, and development in team learning behaviours, linked to situated knowledge and transactivity |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2025 |
source_checked |
2026-10-21 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-21 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — andreas-widmann-2025, andreas-widmann-2025-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.