Claims

Teachers perceived Quest as overly prescriptive, with too much material for a 50–60 minute lesson and insufficient writing opportunities, but valued its texts and co-operative learning

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Teachers' perceived weaknesses were over-prescription, lesson plans containing too much material for a standard 50 or 60-minute period, and insufficient writing opportunities. → Quest: Evaluation report and Executive summary 2015 q2 i? Teachers were positive about the range of books and digital texts and about the co-operative learning structure, particularly teamwork and discussion. → Quest: Evaluation report and Executive summary 2015 (2)

Evidence

Quest: Evaluation report and Executive summary 2015

Quest: Evaluation report and Executive summary. (2015). Education Endowment Foundation. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED581287

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Process evaluation findings from teacher surveys and interviews. One teacher interviewed said: 'We didn't ever really get guidance as to how to get the whole of the Quest lesson into a lesson.'

"The perceived weaknesses of Quest according to teachers were: that it was overly prescriptive; that the lesson plans contained too much material to be covered in a standard 50 or 60-minute school period; and that it contained insufficient writing opportunities."

Quest: Evaluation report and Executive summary 2015 (2)

Quest: Evaluation report and Executive summary. (2015). Education Endowment Foundation. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED581287

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Process evaluation survey and interview findings; positive feedback was also provided on the range of books and digital texts, although these could be improved for 'lower ability' sets.

"On the whole, teachers were also positive about Quest's co-operative learning structure (particularly the teamwork and opportunities for discussion)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.