Claims

Mastering students outperform Passing and Non-passing students across all four dimensions of quiz task activity (views, submissions, repetitions, scores)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Quiz task views, submissions, repetitions, and scores all significantly favored the Mastering group over the Passing and Non-passing groups. → Slaviša Radović 2025

Evidence

Slaviša Radović 2025

Slaviša Radović, Niels Seidel. (2025). Uncovering variations in learning behaviors and cognitive engagement among students with diverse learning goals and outcomes. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-025-10528-4

q2 · i? · associational · r1

Bonferroni post hoc comparisons of quiz task engagement among the three outcome groups. The article reports Mastering exceeded Passing (p = 0.004) and Non-passing on quiz views, with no Passing–Non-passing difference; similar patterns held for submissions, repetitions, and scores.

"post-tests revealed that students in the Mastering group significantly viewed these tasks more frequently than students in the Passing group (p = 0.004) and the (p < 0.001). No differences were observed between Passing and Non-passing students."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-29
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.