Claims

Math age, study design, and sample type did not significantly moderate the RAN–mathematics relationship

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Cross-sectional vs. longitudinal design was not significant, though a trend toward higher concurrent correlations was observed; sample type (typical vs. atypical) was also not significant. → Koponen 2017

Evidence

Koponen 2017

Koponen, T., Georgiou, G., Salmi, P., Leskinen, M., & Aro, M. (2017). A Meta-Analysis of the Relation Between RAN and Mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(7), 977-992. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000182

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r3

Null results on design and sample-type moderators; no effect sizes printed. The article attributes the sample-type null to heterogeneous atypical populations and states the study "did not provide any evidence that there are differences among these groups."

"Although there was a trend showing that concurrent correlations are higher than longitudinal correlations, the difference was not significant."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id ran-math-null-moderators-age-design-sample
title Math age, study design, and sample type did not significantly moderate the RAN–mathematics relationship
description Math age, study design, and sample type did not significantly moderate the RAN–mathematics relationship
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2017
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-24
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — koponen-2017

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.