Raw postsecondary data are useful for descriptive purposes but may not give educators substantial new information beyond high school indicators¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr?·q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Raw postsecondary data alone may not provide educators with substantial new information beyond what high school indicators such as student achievement already show. → Luke Heinkel 2015
Evidence¶
Luke Heinkel 2015¶
Luke Heinkel, Kristin Hallgren, Brian Gill, Megan Shoji. (2015). Making Effective Use of Postsecondary Data in K-12 Education Settings. Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research. https://www.mathematica.org/publications/making-effective-use-of-postsecondary-data-in-k-12-education-settings
q2 · i? · review · r?
The issue brief's key findings state that raw postsecondary data serve descriptive purposes but that "raw postsecondary data alone may not provide educators with substantial new information" beyond high school indicators. No empirical analysis or effect size is reported in the brief.
"Postsecondary data in raw form are useful for descriptive purposes; however, raw postsecondary data alone may not provide educators with substantial new information that they did not know from high school indicators (such as student achievement)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Fewer substantial differences between student groups occurred for behavioral indicators than for academic indicators of postsecondary readiness and success — related
- Predictive accuracy of middle and high school indicators did not vary substantially between student groups — related
- Substantial differences in attaining academic indicators of postsecondary readiness occurred for most student groups, with the largest number between Black and White students, NSLP-eligible and ineligible students, and students entering grade 6 after age 13 — related
- Composite accountability indicators such as A–F letter grades fail to capture the cognitive and noncognitive competencies of deeper learning and college and career readiness — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
raw-postsecondary-data-limited-new-information |
title |
Raw postsecondary data are useful for descriptive purposes but may not give educators substantial new information beyond high school indicators |
description |
Raw postsecondary data are useful for descriptive purposes but may not give educators substantial new information beyond high school indicators |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2015 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — luke-heinkel-2015 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.