Claims

Learner activity and participation increased under the REACT strategy compared with the previous learning model

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Activity and participation of learners in grade XI IIS-1 increased compared with previous learning, and learners responded very well. → Utami et al. 2016

Evidence

Utami et al. 2016

Wiwik Sri Utami, Sumarmi, I Nyoman Ruja, Sugeng Utaya. (2016). React (Relating, Experiencing, Applying, Cooperative, Transferring) Strategy to Develop Geography Skills. Journal of Education and Practice, Vol.7, No.17. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1105313

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Descriptive result from the same single-class quasi-experiment at SMAN 15 Surabaya; the article states participation "increased compared with previous learning model" but prints no statistic or effect size for this outcome.

"The results of the REACT strategy implementation show that the activity and participation of learners in grade XI IIS-1 SMA Negeri 15 Surabaya increased compared with previous learning model."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.