Claims

In a grade XI geography class, learning with the REACT strategy raised geography skills from a pretest average of 76.08 to a posttest average of 84.41, an N-gain of 0.901 in the high category

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? After REACT strategy implementation, geography skills scores increased from 76.08 to 84.41 with a normalized gain of 0.901, categorized as high by the Hake criteria. → Utami et al. 2016

Evidence

Utami et al. 2016

Wiwik Sri Utami, Sumarmi, I Nyoman Ruja, Sugeng Utaya. (2016). React (Relating, Experiencing, Applying, Cooperative, Transferring) Strategy to Develop Geography Skills. Journal of Education and Practice, Vol.7, No.17. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1105313

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Quasi-experiment in grade XI IIS-1 (24 students) at SMAN 15 Surabaya using the REACT strategy on mineral distribution material; skills measured via performance tests, papers and communication. The article reports "the score of N-gain 0.901", which the Hake criteria place in the high category (N-gain > 0.70).

"In a Geography lesson at SMAN 15, the score of the pre-test average was 76.08 and a post test score was 84.41, the score of N-gain 0.901."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.