Descriptive reactivations increase correct details recalled; component reactivations increase details only versus distractor¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Descriptive reactivation yielded significantly more correct details than both controls; component reactivation beat the distractor group but not the Control group on details recalled. → MacLeod 2018
Evidence¶
MacLeod 2018¶
MacLeod, S., Reynolds, M. G. & Lehmann, H. (2018). The mitigating effect of repeated memory reactivations on forgetting. npj Science of Learning 3:9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-018-0025-x
q3 · i? · causal · r2
For the correct-details dependent measure, the ANOVA showed a significant reactivation main effect, F(3, 155) = 5.24, p = 0.002. The Descriptive and Component groups "did not signi ficantly differ" from each other (p = 0.19).
"the participants in the Descriptive group remembered signi ficantly more details than the participants in the Distractor group ( p < 0.001) and the no reactivation Control group ( p < 0.05), demon- strating mitigated forgetting. The participants in the Component group remembered more details than the Distractor group ( p < 0.05), but did not signi ficantly differ from the no reactivation Control group ( p = 0.31)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Component (category-cueing) reactivations mitigate forgetting relative to distractor controls but do not beat no-reactivation controls on image recall — related
- Only descriptive reactivation improves memory precision (correct details per recalled image) — related
- Descriptive reactivations significantly improve free recall of images compared with distractor and no-reactivation controls — related
- At the 28-day retention interval, both descriptive and component reactivations outperform both controls, with relative gains of 58.8–67.2% for images and over 100% for details — reports the opposite
- Reactivations do not increase false memories: no reactivation effect on falsely recalled images or details — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
reactivation-effects-correct-details |
title |
Descriptive reactivations increase correct details recalled; component reactivations increase details only versus distractor |
description |
Descriptive reactivations increase correct details recalled; component reactivations increase details only versus distractor |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2018 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — macleod-2018 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.