Claims

Reading Partners tutoring significantly improves reading comprehension for grade 2-4 struggling readers, with a total effect size of +0.10

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r? · q4 · i1 small
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q4 i1 In a large randomized controlled trial, students who received Reading Partners tutoring gained significantly more on SAT-10 comprehension and other outcomes than students who did not, for a total effect size of +0.10. → Reading Partners: Program Description and Evidence Rating 2013

Evidence

Reading Partners: Program Description and Evidence Rating 2013

Reading Partners: Program Description and Evidence Rating. (2013). https://www.evidenceforessa.org

q4 · i1 · causal · r?

Large randomized controlled trial conducted by MDRC comparing tutored students to controls, two-thirds of whom received "other supplemental literacy services". Outcome was SAT-10 comprehension and other outcomes; total effect size +0.10.

"A large, randomized control trial study conducted by MDRC found that in comparison to students who did not receive Reading Partners tutoring (two-thirds of whom received other supplemental literacy services), those who received Reading Partners tutoring gained significantly more on SAT-10 comprehension and other outcomes, for a total effect size of +0.10."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id reading-partners-tutoring-comprehension-effect
title Reading Partners tutoring significantly improves reading comprehension for grade 2-4 struggling readers, with a total effect size of +0.10
description Reading Partners tutoring significantly improves reading comprehension for grade 2-4 struggling readers, with a total effect size of +0.10
status review
evidence_strength strong
newest_evidence 2013
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — reading-partners-program-description-and-evidence-rating-2013

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.