Reading Partners tutoring significantly improves reading comprehension for grade 2-4 struggling readers, with a total effect size of +0.10¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr?·q4·i1small
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q4 i1 In a large randomized controlled trial, students who received Reading Partners tutoring gained significantly more on SAT-10 comprehension and other outcomes than students who did not, for a total effect size of +0.10. → Reading Partners: Program Description and Evidence Rating 2013
Evidence¶
Reading Partners: Program Description and Evidence Rating 2013¶
Reading Partners: Program Description and Evidence Rating. (2013). https://www.evidenceforessa.org
q4 · i1 · causal · r?
Large randomized controlled trial conducted by MDRC comparing tutored students to controls, two-thirds of whom received "other supplemental literacy services". Outcome was SAT-10 comprehension and other outcomes; total effect size +0.10.
"A large, randomized control trial study conducted by MDRC found that in comparison to students who did not receive Reading Partners tutoring (two-thirds of whom received other supplemental literacy services), those who received Reading Partners tutoring gained significantly more on SAT-10 comprehension and other outcomes, for a total effect size of +0.10."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- In a student-randomized trial, struggling readers in grades 1–4 who used Amira scored significantly higher on the Woodcock Reading Mastery Test Total Reading Composite (effect size = +0.64) than Sustained Silent Reading controls — related
- Reading Partners targets a defined struggling-reader population: grades 2-4, one to twenty-five months below grade level, fluent in English, without IEPs — related
- Literacy First tutoring significantly improved grade 2 ITBS passage comprehension in a multisite randomized controlled trial (effect size +0.19) — related
- Students receiving Experience Corps tutoring and mentorship showed significant improvements in reading and comprehension skills — related
- Sound Partners tutoring has positive effects on the alphabetics of beginning readers in grades K–3 — related
- Corrective Reading produced statistically significant positive effects on oral reading fluency in a randomized controlled trial of third-grade struggling readers — related
- In the Rashotte, MacPhee, and Torgesen (2001) RCT, SpellRead™ produced statistically significant positive effects on alphabetics and reading fluency for fifth- and sixth-grade struggling readers after eight weeks — related
- Reading Recovery has positive effects on general reading achievement for beginning readers, based on three randomized controlled trials — related
- DaisyQuest has positive effects on alphabetics skills in beginning readers, per WWC synthesis of four randomized controlled trials — related
- SpellRead™ shows potentially positive effects on alphabetics for adolescent readers, with an average improvement index of +23 across two studies — related
- Earobics® has positive effects on alphabetics for K–3 beginning readers, based on four WWC-reviewed studies — related
- SpellRead™ has positive effects on alphabetics for struggling beginning readers, with an average improvement index of +18 percentile points — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
reading-partners-tutoring-comprehension-effect |
title |
Reading Partners tutoring significantly improves reading comprehension for grade 2-4 struggling readers, with a total effect size of +0.10 |
description |
Reading Partners tutoring significantly improves reading comprehension for grade 2-4 struggling readers, with a total effect size of +0.10 |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
strong |
newest_evidence |
2013 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — reading-partners-program-description-and-evidence-rating-2013 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.