Reading Recovery improves writing conventions three years after the intervention, but the effect is significant only against one of the two comparison groups¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Reading Recovery showed promising evidence of improving writing conventions skills three years after implementation, though one comparison was not statistically significant. → wc-1
Evidence¶
wc-1¶
What Works Clearinghouse, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. (2023, June). Reading Recovery® Intervention Report | English Language Arts Topic Area. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/InterventionReport/730
q2 · i? · causal · r2
WWC synthesis of Burroughs-Lange & Douëtil (2007) National Curriculum Assessment writing results three years after implementation, in UK Year 4. The report rates the domain as "potentially positive effects" overall, based on a summary of two comparison-group findings.
"One study provides promising evidence that Reading Recovery® improved students’ skills in writing conventions. This assessment is based on one study that meets WWC standards and includes fewer than 350 students."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Reading Recovery improves receptive communication skills immediately after the intervention, with promising evidence from one small quasi-experimental study — related
- Reading Recovery shows uncertain effects on mathematics achievement three years after the intervention — related
- Reading Recovery shows uncertain effects on general academic achievement ten years after the intervention — related
- Reading Recovery improves writing productivity immediately after the intervention, with promising evidence from one small quasi-experimental study — related
- Reading Recovery positively impacts grade 1 literacy achievement immediately after the intervention, with moderate evidence from one randomized controlled trial — related
- Reading Recovery has positive effects on general reading achievement for beginning readers, based on three randomized controlled trials — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
reading-recovery-improves-writing-conventions-mixed |
title |
Reading Recovery improves writing conventions three years after the intervention, but the effect is significant only against one of the two comparison groups |
description |
Reading Recovery improves writing conventions three years after the intervention, but the effect is significant only against one of the two comparison groups |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
mixed |
newest_evidence |
2023 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-07 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — wc-1 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.