Claims

Reading Recovery shows uncertain effects on mathematics achievement three years after the intervention

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r1 · q2 · i0 negligible
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i0 Three years after implementation, Reading Recovery showed no statistically significant average effect on mathematics achievement. → math-1

Evidence

math-1

What Works Clearinghouse, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. (2023, June). Reading Recovery® Intervention Report | English Language Arts Topic Area. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/InterventionReport/730

q2 · i0 · quant-synthesis · r1

WWC synthesis of National Curriculum Assessment mathematics results three years after implementation in Burroughs-Lange & Douëtil (2007), UK Year 4 students in two comparison samples of 121 and 193 students. Neither comparison was statistically significant (p=0.19 and p=0.65).

"The research does not support claims that Reading Recovery® improved student mathematics achievement. This assessment is based on one study that meets WWC standards."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id reading-recovery-uncertain-mathematics-achievement
title Reading Recovery shows uncertain effects on mathematics achievement three years after the intervention
description Reading Recovery shows uncertain effects on mathematics achievement three years after the intervention
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2023
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-07
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — math-1

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.