Recasts on simple past tense errors outperform no feedback on oral accuracy in the final session (p = .040)¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? The recast group significantly outperformed the control group in session 6 oral accuracy. → Farahman Farrokhi 2012

Evidence¶

Farahman Farrokhi 2012¶

Farahman Farrokhi, Mohammad Hassan Chehrazad. (2012). The Effects of Planned Focus on Form on Iranian EFL Learners' Oral Accuracy. World Journal of Education. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v2n1p70

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Dunnett t test comparing each experimental group against the control group across six sessions; no significant differences in sessions 1-5, and in session 6 the recast group beat the control group with "p-value = .040".

"in the session 6 the second group which received recast on the erroneous production outperformed the control group which received no feedback (p-value = .040 < =0.05)"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Purely meaning-focused activity without form-focused treatment did not lead learners to improve oral accuracy — related
• Planned focus on form via corrective feedback on simple past tense errors improves Iranian EFL learners' oral accuracy by the final treatment session — a broader claim this one bears on
• Corrective feedback on second-language errors has a significant effect on L2 development that is maintained on delayed tests — a broader claim this one bears on
• Explicit correction was more effective than implicit or-choice feedback for beginner Iranian EFL learners' production of English tense markers — related
• Most participants preferred the focus on formS approach and deemed it the most effective tense-teaching method — related