The reciprocal relations model fits better than unidirectional alternatives, supporting reciprocal causation between emotions and achievement¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr?·q3
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? The fully forward reciprocal relations model showed significantly better fit than baseline and unidirectional models via Satorra–Bentler scaled χ2 difference tests and lower AIC. → Putwain 2021
Evidence¶
Putwain 2021¶
Putwain, D. W., Wood, P., & Pekrun, R. (2021). Achievement emotions and academic achievement: Reciprocal relations and the moderating influence of academic buoyancy. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000637
q3 · i? · associational · r?
Competitive SEM model comparison in the four-wave longitudinal data showed the reciprocal relations model "showed a good fit to the data that was superior to all other models", supporting bidirectional emotion–achievement relations.
"The RRM showed a good fit to the data that was superior to all other models (Table 4). Furthermore, the RRM showed a significantly better fit than the other models using the Satorra–Bentler scaled χ2 difference test (TRd; Bryant & Satorra, 2012) and an improved relative fit on the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC)."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Achievement Emotions — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes
Related Claims¶
- Simulation evidence shows RI-CLPM estimates are biased when the true model is a CLPM with lag-2 effects, and fit statistics cannot decide between the two — related
- Student-teacher relationship quality and students' classroom emotions show reciprocal longitudinal associations over one year — related
- The extended REM was robust to several alternative modeling specifications proposed by Sorjonen et al. — related
- The reciprocal EF–ER model fits only marginally better than a forward-only model, so model preference rests on theory as much as fit — related
- Reanalyses of simulated and PALMA data provide converging support for the extended reciprocal effects model, including an effect of academic self-concept on achievement — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
reciprocal-model-superior-fit |
title |
The reciprocal relations model fits better than unidirectional alternatives, supporting reciprocal causation between emotions and achievement |
description |
The reciprocal relations model fits better than unidirectional alternatives, supporting reciprocal causation between emotions and achievement |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2021 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-24 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — putwain-2021 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.