Claims

Simulation evidence shows RI-CLPM estimates are biased when the true model is a CLPM with lag-2 effects, and fit statistics cannot decide between the two

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q1
Currency · newest study 2023 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In simulated data, the RI-CLPM led to biased estimates if the true model was a CLPM with lag-2 effects (FF-CLPM), and vice versa; model fit statistics were unsuitable for choosing between them. → Hübner 2023

Evidence

Hübner 2023

Hübner, N., Wagner, W., Zitzmann, S., & Nagengast, B. (2023). How Strong Is the Evidence for a Causal Reciprocal Effect? Contrasting Traditional and New Methods to Investigate the Reciprocal Effects Model of Self-Concept and Achievement. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09724-6

q1 · i? · review · r3

The review reports a simulation study by Lüdtke and Robitzsch in which data were "generated ... based on a CLPM with three measurement occasions", showing RI-CLPM bias under a lag-2 true model and that "model fit statistics do not seem suitable" for model choice.

"they generated data for two variables X and Y based on a CLPM with three measurement occasions and showed that the RI-CLPM leads to biased estimates if the true model is a CLPM with lag-2 effects"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id rudtke-robitzsch-simulation-ri-clpm-bias-lag2
title Simulation evidence shows RI-CLPM estimates are biased when the true model is a CLPM with lag-2 effects, and fit statistics cannot decide between the two
description Simulation evidence shows RI-CLPM estimates are biased when the true model is a CLPM with lag-2 effects, and fit statistics cannot decide between the two
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2023
source_checked 2026-10-20
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-19
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — hübner-2023

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.