Claims

Reflective inquiry instructional technique produces significantly higher achievement in Electronic Works trade than conventional teaching method

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · checked against its sources 2026-11-02 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Students taught with reflective inquiry instructional technique achieved significantly higher posttest scores than students taught with the conventional method (F = 151.225, p = .000). → Dr (Mrs) T. C. Ogbuanya & Dr A. S. Owodunni 2015

Evidence

Dr (Mrs) T. C. Ogbuanya & Dr A. S. Owodunni 2015

Dr (Mrs) T. C. Ogbuanya & Dr A. S. Owodunni. (2015). Effects of Reflective Inquiry Instructional Technique on Students' Academic Achievement and Ability Level in Electronic Work Trade in Technical Colleges. Journal of Education and Practice, Vol.6, No.7. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1083083

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Quasi-experimental pre-test, post-test, non-equivalent control group study of 105 intact-class students; experimental group (n = 43) gained 20.47 points versus 14.48 for controls (n = 62) on the EWAT. ANCOVA showed the group effect was significant: "The F-calculated value for G roup is 151.225". No effect size was printed.

"The F-calculated value for G roup is 151.225 with a significance of F at .000 wh ich is less than .05. The null-hypothesis is therefore rejected at .05 level of significance."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.