Claims

Gender significantly affects Electronic Works achievement, favouring boys

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Male students achieved significantly higher mean scores than female students in the Electronic Works achievement test (F = 4.835, p = .030). → Dr (Mrs) T. C. Ogbuanya & Dr A. S. Owodunni 2015

Evidence

Dr (Mrs) T. C. Ogbuanya & Dr A. S. Owodunni 2015

Dr (Mrs) T. C. Ogbuanya & Dr A. S. Owodunni. (2015). Effects of Reflective Inquiry Instructional Technique on Students' Academic Achievement and Ability Level in Electronic Work Trade in Technical Colleges. Journal of Education and Practice, Vol.6, No.7. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1083083

q2 · i? · causal · r2

ANCOVA on posttest EWAT scores of the full sample (105 students: 76 boys, 29 girls); descriptive mean gains were 20.66 for males versus 19.91 for females under reflective inquiry. "The F-calculated value for gender is 4.835" was significant at .030. No effect size was printed.

"The F-calculated value for gender is 4.835 with a significance of F at .030 which is less than .05. This means that there is significant difference between the effects of Gender on student s' achievement in Electronic work trade."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.