Claims

Preservice teachers must critically reflect on both the potential and limitations of technology in education, with research tasks and digital identity emerging as reflective strategies

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · review r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Reflective practice, including engagement with research tasks, fosters deeper understanding and bridges theory and practice in preservice teacher training. → Jo Tondeur 2025 q3 i? Development of preservice teachers' digital identity is a new theme in the updated model, tied to reflecting on their role in relation to digital technologies. → Jo Tondeur 2025 (2)

Evidence

Jo Tondeur 2025

Jo Tondeur, Ottavia Trevisan, Sarah K. Howard, Johan van Braak. (2025). Preparing preservice teachers to teach with digital technologies: An update of effective SQD-strategies. Computers & Education 232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105262

q3 · i? · review · r2

Meta-aggregation of qualitative studies in the Reflective Practice synthesis, drawing on 21 studies with sub-categories digital pedagogies, research, teacher identity and technology scaffolding. The review reports research tasks such as producing essays or presentations fostered reflection.

"This suggests that incorporating research offers a valuable strategy for bridging the gap between theory and practice (cf. Butler & Leahy, 2021; Eutsler, 2022)."

Jo Tondeur 2025 (2)

Jo Tondeur, Ottavia Trevisan, Sarah K. Howard, Johan van Braak. (2025). Preparing preservice teachers to teach with digital technologies: An update of effective SQD-strategies. Computers & Education 232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105262

q3 · i? · review · r2

Discussion-section interpretation of the updated synthesis: the review identifies digital identity as a new theme, described via Engeness (2021) as a continuous process of interpreting beliefs, values and educational experiences in response to contemporary digital contexts.

"Another new theme in this respect is the importance of preservice teachers' "digital identity" (see Park, 2019)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id reflective-practice-digital-identity-preservice-teachers
title Preservice teachers must critically reflect on both the potential and limitations of technology in education, with research tasks and digital identity emerging as reflective strategies
description Preservice teachers must critically reflect on both the potential and limitations of technology in education, with research tasks and digital identity emerging as reflective strategies
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2025
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-29
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — jo-tondeur-2025, jo-tondeur-2025-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.