Rehearsal as a training component shows no statistically significant effect on DTT implementation fidelity¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2022 · checked against its sources 2026-10-31 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? The moderation effect of rehearsal was −1.79% and not statistically significant (p = .32); participants who rehearsed averaged 88.28% fidelity. → Joelle Fingerhut and Mariola Moeyaert 2022

Evidence¶

Joelle Fingerhut and Mariola Moeyaert 2022¶

Joelle Fingerhut and Mariola Moeyaert. (2022). Training Individuals to Implement Discrete Trials with Fidelity: A Meta-Analysis. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities. https://doi.org/10.1177/10883576221081076

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

HLM moderator analysis (Model 3) in the 46-study meta-analysis tested rehearsal as a moderator. The article reports "−1.79%, γ̂200 = −1.79, t(3692) = −0.99, p =.32", a non-significant result; equivalence was not tested.

"For Model 3 (rehearsal as the moderator), the moderation effect of rehearsal was −1.79%, γ̂200 = −1.79, t(3692) = −0.99, p =.32. Those who had rehearsal during the training implemented DTT with an average of 88.28% fidelity."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Behavioral skills training and other trainings raise DTT implementation fidelity from a low baseline of 40.61% to over 90% accuracy by the end of training — related
• In a meta-analysis of single-case studies, participants trained with complete behavioral skills training had significantly higher DTT implementation fidelity than those trained with only one, two, or three BST components — related
• Modeling as a training component shows no statistically significant effect on DTT implementation fidelity — related