Claims

PS-I effectiveness did not depend on the breadth of prior knowledge activated, but on activation of relevant prior knowledge

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Brand et al. (2025) found no difference between conditions with high or low coverage of conceptual components, and intermediate knowledge correlated significantly with conceptual knowledge outcomes. → Katharina Loibl 2025

Evidence

Katharina Loibl 2025

Katharina Loibl, Valentina Nachtigall, Timo Leuders. (2025). Advances in research on composite instructional designs – investigating intermediate knowledge and preparation effects. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-025-09751-6

q2 · i? · review · r2

The editorial reports, citing Brand et al. (2025), a vicarious problem-solving study manipulating the breadth of activated relevant prior knowledge; there was "no difference between the conditions with high or low coverage of conceptual components". The intermediate knowledge correlation is reported as significant, with no effect size printed.

"they found no difference between the conditions with high or low coverage of conceptual components. The intermediate knowledge was significantly correlated with students’ conceptual knowledge outcomes"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id relevant-not-breadth-prior-knowledge-activation
title PS-I effectiveness did not depend on the breadth of prior knowledge activated, but on activation of relevant prior knowledge
description PS-I effectiveness did not depend on the breadth of prior knowledge activated, but on activation of relevant prior knowledge
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2025
source_checked 2026-10-20
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — katharina-loibl-2025

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.