Claims

Repetition of input yielded higher scores than previewing questions, but the two supports did not differ significantly in this study

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The repetition group (M = 19.77) scored higher than the previewing group (M = 15.44), yet the article reports no statistically significant difference between the previewing and repetition groups. → Rouhi 2014

Evidence

Rouhi 2014

Rouhi, A., Nabavi, S.-M., & Mohebbi, H. (2014). The effects of previewing questions, repetition of input, and topic preparation on listening comprehension of Iranian EFL learners. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 2(2), 73-85. https://www.urmia.ac.ir/ijltr

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Descriptive comparison between the repetition of input group and the previewing questions group in the four-group classroom experiment; descriptive means are reported, and the article's abstract states the difference between these two groups was not statistically significant.

"Moreover, the participants in the repetition of input group (M = 19.77, SD = 4.59) did better than their counterparts in the previewing questions group (M = 15.44, SD = 2.67)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.