Claims

Topic preparation produced the highest listening comprehension scores among the four treatment groups

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? In a one-way ANOVA on the main 40-item listening test, the topic preparation group performed better than the other three groups. → Rouhi 2014

Evidence

Rouhi 2014

Rouhi, A., Nabavi, S.-M., & Mohebbi, H. (2014). The effects of previewing questions, repetition of input, and topic preparation on listening comprehension of Iranian EFL learners. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 2(2), 73-85. https://www.urmia.ac.ir/ijltr

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Descriptive results of a four-group classroom experiment (N = 104 Iranian high school EFL learners) on a 40-item PET-based listening test. The topic preparation group scored highest: "M = 20.56, SD = 3.72"; no effect size printed.

"As shown in Table 1, the topic preparation group (M = 20.56, SD = 3.72) performed better than the other participating groups."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.