Topic preparation produced the highest listening comprehension scores among the four treatment groups¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? In a one-way ANOVA on the main 40-item listening test, the topic preparation group performed better than the other three groups. → Rouhi 2014
Evidence¶
Rouhi 2014¶
Rouhi, A., Nabavi, S.-M., & Mohebbi, H. (2014). The effects of previewing questions, repetition of input, and topic preparation on listening comprehension of Iranian EFL learners. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 2(2), 73-85. https://www.urmia.ac.ir/ijltr
q3 · i? · causal · r2
Descriptive results of a four-group classroom experiment (N = 104 Iranian high school EFL learners) on a 40-item PET-based listening test. The topic preparation group scored highest: "M = 20.56, SD = 3.72"; no effect size printed.
"As shown in Table 1, the topic preparation group (M = 20.56, SD = 3.72) performed better than the other participating groups."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Oral Language — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
- Group differences on the main listening test were statistically significant overall (F = 17.13), with topic preparation and repetition outperforming control — related
- Previewing questions alone did not appear to influence learners' listening comprehension performance — related
- Repetition of input yielded higher scores than previewing questions, but the two supports did not differ significantly in this study — related
- The four groups were homogeneous in general English proficiency before treatment (placement-test ANOVA sig .881) — related
- Group differences reached statistical significance on each of the three listening texts individually — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.