Repetitivist group included significantly more lower-grade students while Multifunctionist group included more upper-grade students¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2029: local conditions change quickly

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Post hoc comparisons using adjusted residuals showed the Repetitivist group had a significantly higher proportion of Grade 8 and 9 students, while the Multifunctionist group had significantly greater representation of Grade 10 and 11 students. → Bautista 2026

Evidence¶

Bautista 2026¶

Bautista, G. Jr., Cacuyong, R., Lavicza, Z., Sabitzer, B., & Emara, M. (2026). Function Art: Understanding the Artistic Transformation of Mathematical Functions through Learning Analytics. Journal of Learning Analytics, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2026.9037

q2 · i? · design · r2

Post hoc pairwise comparisons using adjusted standardized residuals (>1.96, p < .05) following the significant chi-square test for grade level. Results were visualized using heat maps (Figure 4).

"the Repetitivist group included a significantly higher proportion of lower-grade students—specifically Grade s 8 and 9 —compared to the Simplist and Multifunctionist groups (adjusted residuals > 1.96, p <.05). In contrast, the Multifunctionist group showed a significantly greater representation of upper-grade students—namely Grades 10 and 11—relative to the other two groups."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Three distinct learner profiles emerge from function art activities: Repetitivists, Simplists, and Multifunctionists — related
• Multifunctionist students use a broader range of function types than Simplist and Repetitivist students — related