Claims

In rigorous controlled studies, residency graduates retained at significantly higher rates than non-residency peers

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? After controlling for school and district characteristics, two rigorous studies found significant differences in retention between residency graduates and non-residency peers (e.g., 82% vs. 72% still teaching in Year 3 or 4 in the TQP study). → Guha 2016

Evidence

Guha 2016

Guha, R., Hyler, M.E., and Darling-Hammond, L. (2016). The Teacher Residency: An Innovative Model for Preparing Teachers. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute. https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/product/teacher-residency

q2 · i? · review · r2

The Teacher Preparation Quality Grants study used a regression comparing retention of residency graduates to non-resident teachers with similar teaching placements, "controlling for key district and school characteristics". The report also cites the Boston Teacher Residency study: 80% vs. 63% in Year 3 and 75% vs. 51% in Year 5.

"82% of graduates were still teaching in their same district in Year 3 or 4 vs. 72% of non-residents still teaching in their same district Year 3 or 4"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id residency-retention-significant-vs-peers
title In rigorous controlled studies, residency graduates retained at significantly higher rates than non-residency peers
description In rigorous controlled studies, residency graduates retained at significantly higher rates than non-residency peers
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2016
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-10
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — guha-2016

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.