In rigorous controlled studies, residency graduates retained at significantly higher rates than non-residency peers¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? After controlling for school and district characteristics, two rigorous studies found significant differences in retention between residency graduates and non-residency peers (e.g., 82% vs. 72% still teaching in Year 3 or 4 in the TQP study). → Guha 2016
Evidence¶
Guha 2016¶
Guha, R., Hyler, M.E., and Darling-Hammond, L. (2016). The Teacher Residency: An Innovative Model for Preparing Teachers. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute. https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/product/teacher-residency
q2 · i? · review · r2
The Teacher Preparation Quality Grants study used a regression comparing retention of residency graduates to non-resident teachers with similar teaching placements, "controlling for key district and school characteristics". The report also cites the Boston Teacher Residency study: 80% vs. 63% in Year 3 and 75% vs. 51% in Year 5.
"82% of graduates were still teaching in their same district in Year 3 or 4 vs. 72% of non-residents still teaching in their same district Year 3 or 4"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Residency graduates show high retention rates of roughly 80-90% after three years and 70-80% after five years — related
- Residency-prepared teachers remain in teaching and in their districts at higher rates than other novice teachers, typically 80–95% after 3 years — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
- Novice TRP teachers' district retention rates are roughly the same as those of teachers entering through other preparation programs — reports the opposite
- The 2010-2015 study examined characteristics of 30 TRPs, including required coursework, teacher backgrounds and experiences, and teacher retention — related
- Well-prepared and well-mentored teachers stay in teaching at more than twice the rate of unprepared entrants, and teacher residency programs typically retain more than 80% over five years — related
- Kern Urban Teacher Residency graduates are retained at high rates in the partner district, with 92% of its 114 graduates continuing to work in BCSD — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Teacher residency program graduates are more racially diverse than other new teachers and much more likely to stay in teaching, especially in sponsoring high-need districts — related
- Students of residency graduates show achievement outcomes comparable to or better than other novices, with gains emerging over time — related
- School-retention rates are similar between TRP-trained and non-TRP novice teachers — reports the opposite
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
residency-retention-significant-vs-peers |
title |
In rigorous controlled studies, residency graduates retained at significantly higher rates than non-residency peers |
description |
In rigorous controlled studies, residency graduates retained at significantly higher rates than non-residency peers |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2016 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-10 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — guha-2016 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.