School-retention rates are similar between TRP-trained and non-TRP novice teachers¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr?·q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? School-retention rates were similar between TRP teachers and non-TRP teachers. → Tim Silva 2015
Evidence¶
Tim Silva 2015¶
Tim Silva, Allison McKie, Philip Gleason. (2015). New Findings on the Retention of Novice Teachers from Teaching Residency Programs. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee
q2 · i? · associational · r?
Retention analysis of the same two cohorts of novice TRP and non-TRP teachers as of fall 2013. The brief reports that "School-retention rates were similar between the two groups of teachers." No test statistic or effect size is printed; equivalence was not formally tested.
"School-retention rates were similar between the two groups of teachers."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Congress created the Teacher Quality Partnership Grant Program in 2008, which funds teaching residency programs (TRPs) meant to draw highly qualified teachers to high-need schools — related
- The 2010-2015 study examined characteristics of 30 TRPs, including required coursework, teacher backgrounds and experiences, and teacher retention — related
- Novice TRP teachers' district retention rates are roughly the same as those of teachers entering through other preparation programs — related
- The retention comparison covers two cohorts of novice TRP teachers across six districts served by 12 TRPs, with a representative non-TRP comparison sample — related
- Novice teachers trained through teaching residency programs are more likely than similar non-TRP teachers to remain teaching in the same district — related
- Residency-completer principals remained in CPS at similar rates as other principals, with no evidence of differential exit or transfer — related
- A 2011 study found residency-trained teachers outperformed same-experience peers by nearly two months' worth of learning by their fifth year and were more likely to stay in teaching — reports the opposite
- In rigorous controlled studies, residency graduates retained at significantly higher rates than non-residency peers — reports the opposite
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
trp-school-retention-rates-similar |
title |
School-retention rates are similar between TRP-trained and non-TRP novice teachers |
description |
School-retention rates are similar between TRP-trained and non-TRP novice teachers |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2015 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — tim-silva-2015 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.