Claims

School-retention rates are similar between TRP-trained and non-TRP novice teachers

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r? · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? School-retention rates were similar between TRP teachers and non-TRP teachers. → Tim Silva 2015

Evidence

Tim Silva 2015

Tim Silva, Allison McKie, Philip Gleason. (2015). New Findings on the Retention of Novice Teachers from Teaching Residency Programs. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee

q2 · i? · associational · r?

Retention analysis of the same two cohorts of novice TRP and non-TRP teachers as of fall 2013. The brief reports that "School-retention rates were similar between the two groups of teachers." No test statistic or effect size is printed; equivalence was not formally tested.

"School-retention rates were similar between the two groups of teachers."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id trp-school-retention-rates-similar
title School-retention rates are similar between TRP-trained and non-TRP novice teachers
description School-retention rates are similar between TRP-trained and non-TRP novice teachers
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2015
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — tim-silva-2015

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.