Retention scores four weeks after treatment significantly favored both experiment groups over control group 2¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? One-way ANOVA on retention scores was significant, and post-hoc Scheffe tests showed experiment group 1 and experiment group 2 each significantly outperformed control group 2 on retention. → Korkmaz Toklucu 2016
Evidence¶
Korkmaz Toklucu 2016¶
Korkmaz Toklucu, S., & Tay, B. (2016). The effect of cooperative learning method and systematic teaching on students' achievement and retention of knowledge in social studies lesson. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 66, 315-334. http://dx.doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2016.66.18
q3 · i? · causal · r2
One-way ANOVA comparing retention test scores across the four groups, followed by post-hoc Scheffe tests. The article reports significant differences "between experiment group 1 and control group 2, and between experiment group 2 and control group 2, in favor of the experiment groups."
"a significant difference was observed between the retention scores of the experiment and control groups [F (3-106)= 5.900; p< 0.05]. The post -hoc Scheffe test revealed there are significant differences between experiment group 1 and control group 2, and between experiment group 2 and control group 2, in favor of the experiment groups."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- No significant post-test achievement differences between cooperative learning, systematic teaching, and constructivist groups — related
- Achievement gains from educational games-based iPad applications were retained on a delayed test four to six weeks after the post-test, with significant delayed-test differences favoring the experimental group — related
- Within-group score changes across pre-test, post-test and retention test were significant in both pretested groups, with larger variance explained in the experimental group — related
- Technology-supported teaching produced higher learning retention four months later, while control-group retention fell below its pre-test level — related
- Cooperative learning, systematic teaching, and constructivist teaching in control group 1 secured knowledge retention, but the constructivist approach failed in control group 2 — related
- The experimental group's geometry achievement did not change significantly between posttest and one-month retention test — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.