Claims

Retention scores four weeks after treatment significantly favored both experiment groups over control group 2

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? One-way ANOVA on retention scores was significant, and post-hoc Scheffe tests showed experiment group 1 and experiment group 2 each significantly outperformed control group 2 on retention. → Korkmaz Toklucu 2016

Evidence

Korkmaz Toklucu 2016

Korkmaz Toklucu, S., & Tay, B. (2016). The effect of cooperative learning method and systematic teaching on students' achievement and retention of knowledge in social studies lesson. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 66, 315-334. http://dx.doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2016.66.18

q3 · i? · causal · r2

One-way ANOVA comparing retention test scores across the four groups, followed by post-hoc Scheffe tests. The article reports significant differences "between experiment group 1 and control group 2, and between experiment group 2 and control group 2, in favor of the experiment groups."

"a significant difference was observed between the retention scores of the experiment and control groups [F (3-106)= 5.900; p< 0.05]. The post -hoc Scheffe test revealed there are significant differences between experiment group 1 and control group 2, and between experiment group 2 and control group 2, in favor of the experiment groups."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.