Claims

Benefits of retrieval practice have persisted for 6 months in medical students and 9 months in middle-school students

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The chapter reports, citing Larsen et al. (2013), that initial testing of clinical neurology topics enhanced medical students' retention 6 months later relative to studying a review sheet. → Karpicke 2017 q2 i? The chapter reports, citing Carpenter et al. (2009), that retrieval practice of history facts enhanced middle-school students' retention relative to repeated study on a test 9 months later. → Karpicke 2017 (2)

Evidence

Karpicke 2017

Karpicke, J. D. (2017). Retrieval-Based Learning: A Decade of Progress. Learning and Memory: A Comprehensive Reference, 2nd edition, Volume 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809324-5.21055-9

q2 · i? · review · r3

The chapter reports, citing Larsen et al. (2013), research with medical students in which "initial testing of clinical neurology topics enhanced retention 6 months later", relative to a review sheet. No effect size is printed.

"For example, in research with medical students, Larsen et al. (2013) found that initial testing of clinical neurology topics enhanced retention 6 months later, relative to initially studying a review sheet."

Karpicke 2017 (2)

Karpicke, J. D. (2017). Retrieval-Based Learning: A Decade of Progress. Learning and Memory: A Comprehensive Reference, 2nd edition, Volume 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809324-5.21055-9

q2 · i? · review · r3

The chapter reports, citing Carpenter et al. (2009), research with middle-school students where "initial retrieval practice of history facts enhanced retention relative to repeated study" on a final test 9 months later.

"In research with middle-school students, Carpenter et al. (2009) found that initial retrieval practice of history facts enhanced retention relative to repeated study on a final test given 9 months after the initial learning session."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id retrieval-practice-benefits-persist-six-to-nine-months
title Benefits of retrieval practice have persisted for 6 months in medical students and 9 months in middle-school students
description Benefits of retrieval practice have persisted for 6 months in medical students and 9 months in middle-school students
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2017
generated by claude/unspecified on 2026-09-24
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — karpicke-2017, karpicke-2017-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.