Claims

Retroactive inhibition fails to appear when memorized syllables are merely recognized rather than actively reproduced

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r? · q2
Currency · newest study 1912 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Interposing a different mental activity between learning and reproduction diminishes reproduction efficiency, but this inhibition does not appear when the syllables are only recognized, suggesting recognition and reproduction depend on different conditions. → Peters 1912

Evidence

Peters 1912

Peters, W. (1912). Pedagogy at the Berlin Psychological Congress. The Journal of Educational Psychology, 3, 452-457. https://eric.ed.gov/?q=Pedagogy+at+the+Berlin+Psychological+Congress

q2 · i? · causal · r?

Experimental report delivered by G. E. Müller of experiments carried on by one of his pupils, presented at the Berlin congress. The experiments show "such inhibition fails to appear if the memorized syllables are merely recognized and not actively reproduced."

"If a different kind of mental activity is interposed between the learning of a series of syllables and the reproduction of the series, the efficiency of the reproduction is diminished (retroactive inhibition)."

Peters 1912 (2)

Peters, W. (1912). Pedagogy at the Berlin Psychological Congress. The Journal of Educational Psychology, 3, 452-457. https://eric.ed.gov/?q=Pedagogy+at+the+Berlin+Psychological+Congress

q2 · i? · causal · r?

Congress report of Müller's laboratory experiments on retroactive inhibition; the recognition condition showed no inhibition, leading the reporter to state that "Recognition and reproduction, therefore, evidently depend upon different conditions."

"The experiments reported by Miiller, however, show that such inhibition fails to appear if the memorized syllables are merely recognized and not actively reproduced. Recognition and reproduction, therefore, evidently depend upon different conditions."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id retroactive-inhibition-absent-for-recognition
title Retroactive inhibition fails to appear when memorized syllables are merely recognized rather than actively reproduced
description Retroactive inhibition fails to appear when memorized syllables are merely recognized rather than actively reproduced
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 1912
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-24
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — peters-1912, peters-1912-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.