Retroactive inhibition fails to appear when memorized syllables are merely recognized rather than actively reproduced¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr?·q2
Currency · newest study 1912 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Interposing a different mental activity between learning and reproduction diminishes reproduction efficiency, but this inhibition does not appear when the syllables are only recognized, suggesting recognition and reproduction depend on different conditions. → Peters 1912
Evidence¶
Peters 1912¶
Peters, W. (1912). Pedagogy at the Berlin Psychological Congress. The Journal of Educational Psychology, 3, 452-457. https://eric.ed.gov/?q=Pedagogy+at+the+Berlin+Psychological+Congress
q2 · i? · causal · r?
Experimental report delivered by G. E. Müller of experiments carried on by one of his pupils, presented at the Berlin congress. The experiments show "such inhibition fails to appear if the memorized syllables are merely recognized and not actively reproduced."
"If a different kind of mental activity is interposed between the learning of a series of syllables and the reproduction of the series, the efficiency of the reproduction is diminished (retroactive inhibition)."
Peters 1912 (2)¶
Peters, W. (1912). Pedagogy at the Berlin Psychological Congress. The Journal of Educational Psychology, 3, 452-457. https://eric.ed.gov/?q=Pedagogy+at+the+Berlin+Psychological+Congress
q2 · i? · causal · r?
Congress report of Müller's laboratory experiments on retroactive inhibition; the recognition condition showed no inhibition, leading the reporter to state that "Recognition and reproduction, therefore, evidently depend upon different conditions."
"The experiments reported by Miiller, however, show that such inhibition fails to appear if the memorized syllables are merely recognized and not actively reproduced. Recognition and reproduction, therefore, evidently depend upon different conditions."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Practice increases observers' ability to reproduce briefly exposed visual material, with final-over-initial gains ranging from 6% to 44% (average 22%). — related
- Practice effects in visual reproduction are specific: they transfer to new conditions only in proportion to identical ability-conditioning factors. — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
retroactive-inhibition-absent-for-recognition |
title |
Retroactive inhibition fails to appear when memorized syllables are merely recognized rather than actively reproduced |
description |
Retroactive inhibition fails to appear when memorized syllables are merely recognized rather than actively reproduced |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
1912 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-24 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — peters-1912, peters-1912-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.