Practice effects in visual reproduction are specific: they transfer to new conditions only in proportion to identical ability-conditioning factors.¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q1
Currency · newest study 1910 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q1 i? Increased ability depends on the particular material, time, instructions and conditions; tricks gained with dot-figures were valueless with other material, and the observers were not better observers or memorizers in general. → Foster 1910
Evidence¶
Foster 1910¶
Foster, W. S. (1910). The Effect of Practice upon Visualizing and upon the Reproduction of Visual Impressions. The Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0075685
q1 · i? · causal · r1
Theoretical conclusion drawn from the experiment's results and introspections. The conclusions section argues practice is specific, that dot-figure tricks were valueless elsewhere, and that no general habits of observing closely were furnished.
"Practice, in other words, is specific. Practice with one set of conditions is valuable in a new set, only in proportion as the second set of conditions contain identical ability-conditioning factors."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Individual differences in quick visual apprehension are striking and material-specific, negating the notion of a general ability to apprehend visually — related
- Practise has a very slight effect on the range of attention, explicable by habituation and grouping tricks rather than any expansion of the range itself — related
- Practice increases observers' ability to reproduce briefly exposed visual material, with final-over-initial gains ranging from 6% to 44% (average 22%). — related
- Practice gains are greater for nonsense material (average final gain 28%) than for sense-material (average final gain 10%). — related
- Systematic practise gives little warrant for markedly improving adults' quick visual perception; the slight poetry gain is attributed to familiarity with the poem — related
- Retroactive inhibition fails to appear when memorized syllables are merely recognized rather than actively reproduced — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
practice-effects-specific-to-conditions |
title |
Practice effects in visual reproduction are specific: they transfer to new conditions only in proportion to identical ability-conditioning factors. |
description |
Practice effects in visual reproduction are specific: they transfer to new conditions only in proportion to identical ability-conditioning factors. |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
1910 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-24 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — foster-1910 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.