Claims

In Study 1, the revised intervention reduced hypothetical choice of the easy math assignment from 60% to 51% relative to the original (d=.19)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3 · i0 negligible
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i0 The revised intervention reduced the proportion choosing the easy extra-credit assignment versus the hard one from 60% to 51% compared with the original intervention (d=.19). → Yeager 2016

Evidence

Yeager 2016

Yeager, D. S., Romero, C., Paunesku, D., Hulleman, C. S., Schneider, B., Hinojosa, C., Lee, H. Y., O'Brien, J., Flint, K., Roberts, A., Trott, J., Greene, D., Walton, G. M., & Dweck, C. S. (2016). Using Design Thinking to Improve Psychological Interventions: The Case of the Growth Mindset During the Transition to High School. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(3), 374–391. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000098

q3 · i0 · causal · r2

Secondary analysis in the same Study 1 sample used a dichotomous hypothetical extra-credit choice based on Mueller and Dweck (1998). The revised condition showed "from 60% to 51%" choosing the easy assignment, logistic regression Z=7.951, d=.19 — a small printed effect size.

"Compared to the original mindset intervention, the revised mindset intervention reduced the proportion of students saying they would choose the “easy” math homework assignment versus the “hard” assignment from 60% to 51%, logistic regression Z=7.951, p<.001, d=.19."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id revised-mindset-intervention-hypothetical-challenge-choice
title In Study 1, the revised intervention reduced hypothetical choice of the easy math assignment from 60% to 51% relative to the original (d=.19)
description In Study 1, the revised intervention reduced hypothetical choice of the easy math assignment from 60% to 51% relative to the original (d=.19)
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2016
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — yeager-2016

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.