In Study 1, the revised intervention reduced hypothetical choice of the easy math assignment from 60% to 51% relative to the original (d=.19)¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3·i0negligible
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i0 The revised intervention reduced the proportion choosing the easy extra-credit assignment versus the hard one from 60% to 51% compared with the original intervention (d=.19). → Yeager 2016
Evidence¶
Yeager 2016¶
Yeager, D. S., Romero, C., Paunesku, D., Hulleman, C. S., Schneider, B., Hinojosa, C., Lee, H. Y., O'Brien, J., Flint, K., Roberts, A., Trott, J., Greene, D., Walton, G. M., & Dweck, C. S. (2016). Using Design Thinking to Improve Psychological Interventions: The Case of the Growth Mindset During the Transition to High School. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(3), 374–391. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000098
q3 · i0 · causal · r2
Secondary analysis in the same Study 1 sample used a dichotomous hypothetical extra-credit choice based on Mueller and Dweck (1998). The revised condition showed "from 60% to 51%" choosing the easy assignment, logistic regression Z=7.951, d=.19 — a small printed effect size.
"Compared to the original mindset intervention, the revised mindset intervention reduced the proportion of students saying they would choose the “easy” math homework assignment versus the “hard” assignment from 60% to 51%, logistic regression Z=7.951, p<.001, d=.19."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- In Study 1, the revised intervention reduced fixed-trait attributions and performance-avoidance goals relative to the original, with small effects — related
- In Study 1, the revised growth mindset intervention reduced choosing easy over hard math problems more than the original intervention (d=.19) — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
- In Study 1, the revised intervention reduced self-reported fixed mindset more than the original intervention — related
- In Study 1, measured fixed mindset correlated with fixed-trait attributions (r=.28), performance avoidance goals (r=.23), and hypothetical easy-problem choice (r=.12) — related
- In Study 1, students rated the revised intervention as more interesting and more informative than the original intervention — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
revised-mindset-intervention-hypothetical-challenge-choice |
title |
In Study 1, the revised intervention reduced hypothetical choice of the easy math assignment from 60% to 51% relative to the original (d=.19) |
description |
In Study 1, the revised intervention reduced hypothetical choice of the easy math assignment from 60% to 51% relative to the original (d=.19) |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2016 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — yeager-2016 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.