Fewer than five percent of submissions described AI as opening new opportunities for inclusivity, a gap the report highlights¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Fewer than 5% of submissions described AI as opening inclusivity opportunities, despite nearly every submission mentioning equity. → inclusivity-gap

Evidence¶

inclusivity-gap¶

Noakes, S., Shell, A., Van Nostrand, P., Murillo, A., Ruiz, P., and Liberman, B. (2024, September). AI-Powered Innovations in Mathematics Teaching & Learning: Initial Findings. Digital Promise. https://doi.org/10.51388/20.500.12265/229

q2 · i? · qualitative · r2

Thematic coding of the RFI's purpose-of-AI question. The few inclusivity responses described lowering costs, translation into native languages, community building, accessibility for students with disabilities, and social-emotional learning data. The discussion adds that "rarely were submissions intentional and thoughtful about leveraging meaningful co-design processes".

"While fewer than five percent of submissions described the use of AI as opening new opportunities for inclusivity, those that did identified valuable tactics for the education field to consider."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Academic integrity, professional development, and equity concerns about AI span all surveyed units, though interpreted differently — related
• Equitable access emerged as a prominent governance theme, with one-third of panelists explicitly mentioning equity or inclusion — related