Equitable access emerged as a prominent governance theme, with one-third of panelists explicitly mentioning equity or inclusion¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Panelists voiced concern that without deliberate action GenAI could exacerbate digital divides or create new inequities, with one-third of the panel explicitly mentioning equity or inclusion. → Crompton 2026

Evidence¶

Crompton 2026¶

Crompton, H., Burke, D., Nickel, C., Bozkurt, A., Miao, F., Sharples, M., Greene, J. A., Parsons, D., Gill-Simmen, L., Edmett, A., Pegrum, M., de Waard, I., Bonk, C. J., Garcia, M. B., Curry, J. H., Lindsey, L., Yang, M., Marshall, S., Bali, M., Deutsch, N., le Roux, S., Benali, M., Bin Samsudin, M. A., Tinmaz, H., Bernacki, M. L., van Wyk, M., Singh, L., Chigona, A., Eaton, L., Xiao, J., Velander, J., Kim, J., Bellas, F., Rajalakshmi, R., de Bem Machado, A., Palalas, A., & Yu, S. (2026). Governing generative AI in higher education: a global Delphi study on policy and practice. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 23(21). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-026-00602-z

q2 · i? · qualitative · r3

Grounded-coding finding from the Delphi panel: "Panelists voiced concern that without deliberate action, GenAI could exacerbate digital divides." One panelist warned that policies not explicitly addressing access risk furthering divides along class and socio-economic lines.

"Panelists voiced concern that without deliberate action, GenAI could exacerbate digital divides or create new inequities."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Academic integrity, professional development, and equity concerns about AI span all surveyed units, though interpreted differently — related
• Nursing students and faculty report concerns that AI use may weaken critical thinking, enable plagiarism and misinformation, and create unequal access — related
• Universities' GenAI policies widely embrace core ethical and governance principles but often overlook inclusion, equity, and sustainability issues such as internet access, gender parity in AI, and environmental impact — related
• Staff raised equity concerns that students who pay for upgraded GenAI tools gain an advantage over peers using free versions — related
• AI in education poses challenges across three interrelated domains: knowledge itself, the process of knowing, and the socio-environmental impact of knowledge production — related
• Over one-third of PGR participants emphasised financial support for paid AI tools as necessary institutional support for responsible GenAI use — related
• Without attention, educational innovations tend to exacerbate rather than reduce learning gaps between well-off and lower-resourced individuals — related
• The bespoke GenAI workflow operated as a modest equalising mechanism, with students reporting inclusive participation regardless of prior AI or drawing experience — related
• GenAI-mediated digital inequality in higher education extends beyond access to tool capability, skills, and pedagogical support — related
• First-generation status is a significant predictor of reliance intensity, indicating a compensatory dynamic at minority-serving institutions — related
• Digital education innovations are an interplay of technological, pedagogical, organisational and governance-related dimensions — related
• Contrary to claims that AI will automatically engender a more democratic, equal, and sustainable world, the editorial argues these technologies tend to exacerbate existing inequalities, environmental degradation, and labour precarity — related
• Equitable-access and digital-inclusion themes are minimally represented in HI/HIM AI policies — related
• SAIL is designed to address second- and third-level digital divides through scaffolded skills and explicitly embedded equity competencies — related
• Do-it-yourself digital learning alone can exacerbate digital inequalities because learners hit a wall requiring direct guided instruction — related
• Fewer than five percent of submissions described AI as opening new opportunities for inclusivity, a gap the report highlights — related
• Access and resource disparities in AI usage widen divides among postsecondary students — related
• Expert panelists overwhelmingly favor a hybrid governance model combining formal policies and flexible guidelines for GenAI in higher education — related
• Little attention has been paid to the undesirable consequences of indiscriminate AI application, including automation-driven socio-economic inequality — related
• Privacy and data protection was a critical governance theme, raised by over half the expert panel — related