Claims

Grade 3 Really Great Reading students did not outperform non-users on the winter NWEA MAP administration

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r? · q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Grade 3 RGR students did not outperform the growth of non-users on the winter NWEA MAP, with an effect size of -0.13. → Really Great Reading 2023

Evidence

Really Great Reading 2023

Really Great Reading. (2023). Really Great Reading. https://www.reallygreatreading.com

q2 · i? · causal · r?

In the same quasi-experimental charter-network study, Grade 3 was the exception to the positive younger-grade findings: "effect size = -0.13" on the winter NWEA MAP administration. No significance test or standard error is printed for this contrast.

"Grade 3 RGR students did not outperform the growth of the non-users on the winter administration of the NWEA MAP (effect size = -0.13)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id rgr-grade3-no-outperformance-map
title Grade 3 Really Great Reading students did not outperform non-users on the winter NWEA MAP administration
description Grade 3 Really Great Reading students did not outperform non-users on the winter NWEA MAP administration
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2023
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-07
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — really-great-reading-2023

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.