Claims

Rhythmical density correlates negatively with knee movement amplitude and positively with flexion frequency

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i3 L2 norm scores correlate with rhythmical density at r = −0.7 and phase changes at r = 0.63, both p < 0.0001. → Moura 2023

Evidence

Moura 2023

Moura, N., Vidal, M., Aguilera, A. M., Vilas-Boas, J. P., Serra, S. & Leman, M. (2023). Knee flexion of saxophone players anticipates tonal context of music. npj Science of Learning 8:22. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-023-00172-z

q2 · i3 · associational · r2

Correlational analysis of smoothed knee curves (functional PCA smoothing) against rhythmical density profiles in the expressive condition; the article reports "r = − 0.7" and "r = 0.63", both p < 0.0001.

"Pearson correlation coefficient is r = − 0.7, p < 0.0001 for the L2 norm scores and r = 0.63, p < 0.0001 for the phase changes (Fig. 1c) with regard to the rhythmical density scores"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id rhythmical-density-knee-movement-correlation
title Rhythmical density correlates negatively with knee movement amplitude and positively with flexion frequency
description Rhythmical density correlates negatively with knee movement amplitude and positively with flexion frequency
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2023
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — moura-2023

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.