Claims

RME learning has a large positive overall effect on Indonesian students' mathematical literacy (g = 1.031)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i3 Across seventeen primary studies, RME learning yielded a statistically significant, robust positive effect on students' mathematical literacy proficiency (g = 1.031, p < 0.05). → Amelia Defrianti Putri 2024

Evidence

Amelia Defrianti Putri 2024

Amelia Defrianti Putri, Dadang Juandi, Turmudi. (2024). Realistic mathematics education and mathematical literacy: a meta-analysis conducted on studies in Indonesia. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), Vol. 18, No. 4. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v18i4.21650

q3 · i3 · quant-synthesis · r2

Random-effects meta-analysis of seventeen experimental studies with control groups, published 2014–2023 in Indonesia, computed in CMA software using Hedges' equation. The pooled effect size was "g = 1.031", with the Z test significant below the 0.05 threshold (overall Z = 8.413, p = 0.000).

"Therefore, the collective impact size of RME learning on the mathematical literacy proficiency of the students was determined to be g = 1.031, indicating a substantial positive effect."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.