Claims

Geographical location does not significantly moderate the effect of RME on mathematical literacy

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Rural studies showed a larger descriptive effect (g = 1.223) than urban studies (g = 0.943), but the heterogeneity test was non-significant (Q = 0.976, p = 0.323). → Amelia Defrianti Putri 2024

Evidence

Amelia Defrianti Putri 2024

Amelia Defrianti Putri, Dadang Juandi, Turmudi. (2024). Realistic mathematics education and mathematical literacy: a meta-analysis conducted on studies in Indonesia. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), Vol. 18, No. 4. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v18i4.21650

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Moderator analysis of eleven urban-area and six rural-area studies. The printed Q was 0.976 with p = 0.323; the article concludes effect magnitudes across geographic locations are homogeneous, so RME efficacy is unaffected by geographical context. No moderator effect size is printed.

"The outcomes of heterogeneity testing manifest a discernible variance in the mean impact magnitude across distinct educational strata (Q = 0.976, p = 0.323). Nonetheless, given that the p-value surpasses the threshold of 0.05, it is elucidated that the array of effect magnitudes for both delineations about the students' geographic locational demonstrates homogeneity."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.