Claims

Round-robin instructional strategy produces higher student interest in electrochemistry than conventional teaching among Nigerian senior secondary students

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Students taught electrochemistry with Round-robin had significantly higher mean interest scores than students taught with the conventional method (t208 = 5.70, p = .00). → Adigun Folaranmi A; Grace A. Ajagun; Madu Samuel 2019

Evidence

Adigun Folaranmi A; Grace A. Ajagun; Madu Samuel 2019

Adigun Folaranmi A; Grace A. Ajagun; Madu Samuel (2019). Effect of Round-Robin Instructional Strategy on Senior Secondary School Students' Interest in Electrochemistry in Federal Capital Territory Abuja Nigeria. Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, 6(3): 129-134. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.509.2019.63.129.134

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Quasi-experimental pre-test/post-test control-group study of 210 SSS2 students in two co-educational schools; independent t-test on post-test interest scores. The article reports "t 208 = 5.70, P =.00" and an effect magnitude of around 14% (r2), described as a large effect.

"The mean difference of 28. 01 is statistically significant, (t 208 = 5.70, P =.00). This show s that there is statistical difference between the experimental group and control group mean interest scores."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.