Claims

No significant difference in interest between male and female students taught electrochemistry with Round-robin

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The null hypothesis of no significant difference in mean interest scores of male and female students taught with Round-robin was retained (t = -7.67, p = 0.52). → Adigun Folaranmi A; Grace A. Ajagun; Madu Samuel 2019

Evidence

Adigun Folaranmi A; Grace A. Ajagun; Madu Samuel 2019

Adigun Folaranmi A; Grace A. Ajagun; Madu Samuel (2019). Effect of Round-Robin Instructional Strategy on Senior Secondary School Students' Interest in Electrochemistry in Federal Capital Territory Abuja Nigeria. Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, 6(3): 129-134. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.509.2019.63.129.134

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Dependent t-test analysis (Table 4) of interest scores of male (n = 59) and female (n = 44) students in the Round-robin group; the article reports t = -7.67 and P = 0.52 and retained the null hypothesis. Equivalence was not formally tested.

"In addition, the calculated value of t is -7.67 while the P-value is 0.52. Since the P -value is greater than 0.05, it means that there is less than 1% chance that the difference between the male and female students mean scores occurred by chance."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.