RRRP scores were fairly stable across fall to spring in third grade, with a slight decrease in Part 1 and no change in Part 2¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Part 1 scores decreased slightly from fall to spring (b = −.418, p < .001), while Part 2 color-switch scores did not change (b = −.024, p = .811). → Day 2017
Evidence¶
Day 2017¶
Day, Stephanie L.; Connor, Carol M. (2017). Examining the relations between self-regulation and achievement in third grade students. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 42(2), 97-109. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508416670367
q3 · i? · associational · r2
A repeated measures ANCOVA compared fall and spring RRRP scores in the same sample. The authors report the printed coefficients and conclude that "scores on the RRRP are fairly stable in third grade"; the b values are unstandardized coefficients, not effect sizes.
"Part 1 scores on the RRRP decreased slightly from time one to time two (b = −.418, p < .001), but Part 2 (color switch) scores on the RRRP did not change over time (b = −.024, p = .811), indicating that scores on the RRRP are fairly stable in third grade."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Fall RRRP predicted spring reading outcomes, with Part 1 predicting decoding and comprehension and Part 2 predicting vocabulary and gains in comprehension and vocabulary — related
- Fall RRRP scores are significantly associated with working memory and attention measures, and its wait-for-go score with inhibitory-control ratings, in third graders — related
- Fall RRRP Part 1 predicted spring Applied Problems mathematics scores and gains, but did not predict spring Math Fluency — related
- Children's ability to wait for 'go' on the RRRP was not a significant predictor of any academic outcome and was removed from the models — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
rrrp-scores-stable-fall-to-spring |
title |
RRRP scores were fairly stable across fall to spring in third grade, with a slight decrease in Part 1 and no change in Part 2 |
description |
RRRP scores were fairly stable across fall to spring in third grade, with a slight decrease in Part 1 and no change in Part 2 |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2017 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — day-2017 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.