Children's ability to wait for 'go' on the RRRP was not a significant predictor of any academic outcome and was removed from the models¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? The 'wait for go' score was not a significant predictor in any of the academic models, though it was correlated with SWAN hyperactivity ratings. → Day 2017
Evidence¶
Day 2017¶
Day, Stephanie L.; Connor, Carol M. (2017). Examining the relations between self-regulation and achievement in third grade students. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 42(2), 97-109. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508416670367
q3 · i? · associational · r2
Across the HLM models of spring mathematics and reading outcomes in the 282-student sample, the 'wait for go' variable was tested and then dropped. The authors report it "was not a significant predictor in any of the academic models"; no effect size is printed, so this is a non-detection.
"Children’s ability to wait for “go” was not a significant predictor in any of the academic models and was thus removed from the models."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Fall RRRP scores are significantly associated with working memory and attention measures, and its wait-for-go score with inhibitory-control ratings, in third graders — related
- Teacher-rated hyperactive/impulsive behavior did not predict any first-grade academic outcomes in children with low number sense — related
- Fall RRRP Part 1 predicted spring Applied Problems mathematics scores and gains, but did not predict spring Math Fluency — related
- RRRP scores were fairly stable across fall to spring in third grade, with a slight decrease in Part 1 and no change in Part 2 — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
wait-for-go-not-predictive-of-academic-outcomes |
title |
Children's ability to wait for 'go' on the RRRP was not a significant predictor of any academic outcome and was removed from the models |
description |
Children's ability to wait for 'go' on the RRRP was not a significant predictor of any academic outcome and was removed from the models |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2017 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — day-2017 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.