Reaction times are faster for predictable targets, but the RT benefit of prediction diminishes with progressing age¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? A linear mixed-effects model on correct reaction times showed faster responses to predictable targets. → Nir Shalev 2024
q3 i? The RT benefit associated with the Response-Onset Interval decreased with age (Age × Interval interaction). → Nir Shalev 2024 (2)
Evidence¶
Nir Shalev 2024¶
Nir Shalev, Sage Boettcher & Anna C. Nobre. (2024). Spatiotemporal predictions guide attention throughout the adult lifespan. npj Science of Learning. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-024-00281-3
q3 · i? · causal · r2
LMM on correct-response reaction times from the online dynamic search task (N = 300). The article reports "main effects of Predictability ( β = 0.015; SE = 0.006; t(270.5) = −2.239; p = 0.025)", and states reaction times were faster for predictable targets.
"Analysis of the reaction times in the dynamic visual-search task revealed main effects of Predictability ( β = 0.015; SE = 0.006; t(270.5) = −2.239; p = 0.025)"
Nir Shalev 2024 (2)¶
Nir Shalev, Sage Boettcher & Anna C. Nobre. (2024). Spatiotemporal predictions guide attention throughout the adult lifespan. npj Science of Learning. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-024-00281-3
q3 · i? · causal · r2
Same LMM on reaction times. The Age × Response-Onset Interval interaction "(β = 0.02; SE = 0.007; t(440.5) = 2.788;p = 0.005)" is reported; the authors note the benefit of the conditional probability was attenuated for older adults, though a similar trend appeared across all ages.
"alongside a two-way interaction of Response-Onset Interval and Age (β = 0.02; SE = 0.007; t(440.5) = 2.788;p = 0.005)"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The accuracy benefit of spatiotemporal predictions does not interact with age across the adult lifespan — related
- Overall dynamic search performance declines with age, with accuracy decreasing and response times slowing — related
- The magnitude of ERP prediction markers correlates with the behavioral reaction-time benefit of predictability — related
- Predictable targets are detected at higher hit rates than unpredictable targets in dynamic visual search across adulthood — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
rt-prediction-benefit-reduced-with-older-age |
title |
Reaction times are faster for predictable targets, but the RT benefit of prediction diminishes with progressing age |
description |
Reaction times are faster for predictable targets, but the RT benefit of prediction diminishes with progressing age |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2024 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — nir-shalev-2024, nir-shalev-2024-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.