Claims

Knowledge of grammar rules correlates positively with subsequent receptive and productive use of tenses in both groups, more strongly in the IEGI group

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associational r1 · q2 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i3 Among experimental learners, RAT scores correlated positively and significantly with GT (r = .513), OT (r = .790), and WT (r = .855). → Đặng 2012 q2 i3 Among control learners, RAT correlated significantly with OT (r = .661) and WT (r = .818), but weakly with GT (r = .472). → Đặng 2012 (2)

Evidence

Đặng 2012

Đặng, T. T. Đ., & Nguyễn, H. T. (2012). Direct versus Indirect Explicit Methods of Enhancing EFL Students' English Grammatical Competence: A Concept Checking-based Consciousness-raising Tasks Model. English Language Teaching, 6(1), 112. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n1p112

q2 · i3 · causal · r2

Correlational analysis among the 47 experimental learners relating rule analysis test scores to grammar, oral, and delayed written test scores; the printed correlation coefficients were r = .513 (GT), r = .790 (OT), and r = .855 (WT), all reported statistically significant.

"There is a positive relationship between the RAT and the ot her three tests: GT (.513), OT (.790), and WT (.855) among the experimental learners and all were found to be statistically significant"

Đặng 2012 (2)

Đặng, T. T. Đ., & Nguyễn, H. T. (2012). Direct versus Indirect Explicit Methods of Enhancing EFL Students' English Grammatical Competence: A Concept Checking-based Consciousness-raising Tasks Model. English Language Teaching, 6(1), 112. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n1p112

q2 · i3 · associational · r1

Correlational analysis among the 47 control learners relating rule analysis scores to oral (r = .661), delayed written (r = .818), and grammar test (r = .472) scores; the article characterizes the RAT-GT relationship as weak. The authors note the CG correlations were lower than the EG's.

"Although the correlation figures of the OT (.661), WT (.818) were all statistically significant, the relationship between the RAT and the GT was weak; its correlative value was .472."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.