Knowledge of grammar rules correlates positively with subsequent receptive and productive use of tenses in both groups, more strongly in the IEGI group¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associationalr1·q2·i3large
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i3 Among experimental learners, RAT scores correlated positively and significantly with GT (r = .513), OT (r = .790), and WT (r = .855). → Đặng 2012
q2 i3 Among control learners, RAT correlated significantly with OT (r = .661) and WT (r = .818), but weakly with GT (r = .472). → Đặng 2012 (2)
Evidence¶
Đặng 2012¶
Đặng, T. T. Đ., & Nguyễn, H. T. (2012). Direct versus Indirect Explicit Methods of Enhancing EFL Students' English Grammatical Competence: A Concept Checking-based Consciousness-raising Tasks Model. English Language Teaching, 6(1), 112. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n1p112
q2 · i3 · causal · r2
Correlational analysis among the 47 experimental learners relating rule analysis test scores to grammar, oral, and delayed written test scores; the printed correlation coefficients were r = .513 (GT), r = .790 (OT), and r = .855 (WT), all reported statistically significant.
"There is a positive relationship between the RAT and the ot her three tests: GT (.513), OT (.790), and WT (.855) among the experimental learners and all were found to be statistically significant"
Đặng 2012 (2)¶
Đặng, T. T. Đ., & Nguyễn, H. T. (2012). Direct versus Indirect Explicit Methods of Enhancing EFL Students' English Grammatical Competence: A Concept Checking-based Consciousness-raising Tasks Model. English Language Teaching, 6(1), 112. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n1p112
q2 · i3 · associational · r1
Correlational analysis among the 47 control learners relating rule analysis scores to oral (r = .661), delayed written (r = .818), and grammar test (r = .472) scores; the article characterizes the RAT-GT relationship as weak. The authors note the CG correlations were lower than the EG's.
"Although the correlation figures of the OT (.661), WT (.818) were all statistically significant, the relationship between the RAT and the GT was weak; its correlative value was .472."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- IEGI and DEGI produced no significant difference in using English tenses in a pre-defined (receptive) grammar-test context — related
- IEGI students significantly outperformed DEGI students in oral production of English tenses one week after treatment — related
- EFL students taught with indirect explicit grammar instruction (consciousness-raising tasks) significantly outperformed direct-instruction peers on rule analysis of English tenses — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.