IEGI and DEGI produced no significant difference in using English tenses in a pre-defined (receptive) grammar-test context¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The grammar test (GT) difference between the experimental and control groups was not statistically significant (p = .561); equivalence was not formally tested. → Đặng 2012
Evidence¶
Đặng 2012¶
Đặng, T. T. Đ., & Nguyễn, H. T. (2012). Direct versus Indirect Explicit Methods of Enhancing EFL Students' English Grammatical Competence: A Concept Checking-based Consciousness-raising Tasks Model. English Language Teaching, 6(1), 112. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n1p112
q2 · i? · causal · r2
Independent-samples t-test on post-treatment grammar test means (EG M=.624, SD=.178; CG M=.602, SD=.175; t=.584, df=92). The article reports the difference as insignificant with no effect size printed; equivalence was not tested.
"It is clear that from the GT that the differences betw een the two groups were not large enough to reject the null hypothesis; the P value was .561, higher than the set up level .05. Unexpectedly, these results were found to be insignificant."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Knowledge of grammar rules correlates positively with subsequent receptive and productive use of tenses in both groups, more strongly in the IEGI group — related
- A remedial grammar error correction session produced no statistically significant posttest difference between the experimental and control groups — related
- Pre-test comparison showed no significant difference between experimental and control groups before implementation — related
- The GCR and control groups were equivalent in grammar performance before treatment — related
- IEGI students significantly outperformed DEGI students in oral production of English tenses one week after treatment — related
- EFL students taught with indirect explicit grammar instruction (consciousness-raising tasks) significantly outperformed direct-instruction peers on rule analysis of English tenses — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.